Identification of a novel Leucine-rich repeat protein and candidate PP1 regulatory subunit expressed in developing spermatids
© Wang and Sperry; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 13 September 2007
Accepted: 31 January 2008
Published: 31 January 2008
Spermatogenesis is comprised of a series of highly regulated developmental changes that transform the precursor germ cell into a highly specialized spermatozoon. The last phase of spermatogenesis, termed spermiogenesis, involves dramatic morphological change including formation of the acrosome, elongation and condensation of the nucleus, formation of the flagella, and disposal of unnecessary cytoplasm. A prominent cytoskeletal component of the developing spermatid is the manchette, a unique microtubular structure that surrounds the nucleus of the developing spermatid and is thought to assist in both the reshaping of the nucleus and redistribution of spermatid cytoplasm. Although the molecular motor KIFC1 has been shown to associate with the manchette, its precise role in function of the manchette and the identity of its testis specific protein partners are unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify proteins in the testis that interact with KIFC1 using a yeast 2 hybrid screen of a testis cDNA library.
Thirty percent of the interacting clones identified in our screen contain an identical cDNA encoding a 40 kD protein. This interacting protein has 4 leucine-rich repeats in its amino terminal half and is expressed primarily in the testis; therefore we have named this protein t estis l eucine-r ich r epeat protein or TLRR. TLRR was also found to associate tightly with the KIFC1 targeting domain using affinity chromatography. In addition to the leucine-rich repeats, TLRR contains a consensus-binding site for protein phosphatase-1 (PP1). Immunocytochemistry using a TLRR specific antibody demonstrates that this protein is found near the manchette of developing spermatids.
We have identified a previously uncharacterized leucine-rich repeat protein that is expressed abundantly in the testis and associates with the manchette of developing spermatids, possibly through its interaction with the KIFC1 molecular motor. TLRR is homologous to a class of regulatory subunits for PP1, a central phosphatase in the reversible phosphorylation of proteins that is key to modulation of many intracellular processes. TLRR may serve to target this important signaling molecule near the nucleus of developing spermatids in order to control the cellular rearrangements of spermiogenesis.
Spermatogenesis consists of three phases: mitotic division of spermatogonia, meiotic division of spermatocytes and cellular transformation of haploid gametes during spermiogenesis. The final phase requires quite striking cellular reorganization to produce functional sperm including biogenesis of spermatid specific organelles and structures such as the acrosome and microtubule manchette, removal of excess cytoplasm, and streamlining of the spermatid nucleus into its final shape . These unique forms of intracellular motility are expected to require specific adaptations of the spermatid cytoskeleton and associated molecular motor proteins . We have identified a kinesin-related molecular motor, KIFC1, a C-terminal motor and member of the Kinesin-14 subfamily , associated with the spermatid nucleus during the morphological changes of spermiogenesis . This molecular motor is first seen adjacent to the round spermatid nucleus in early spermatids of approximately step 1–2 and then migrates to the nuclear surface and the growing acrosome of step 7–8 spermatids . In more elongate spermatids, KIFC1 locates near the spermatid manchette, a spermatid-specific microtubule structure thought to be important for spermatid nuclear shaping  and redistribution of cytoplasm (reviewed in ).
Previous work identified a 19 amino acid sequence in the tail domain of KIFC1 that is necessary and sufficient to target this motor to membranous structures in cultured cells . Furthermore, we have shown recently that this domain assembles a complex containing the nucleoporin NUP62 in testis lysate . The localization of this molecular motor near the nucleus of elongating spermatids and its association with proteins of the nuclear membrane makes KIFC1 an excellent candidate for participation in the unique transformation of the nucleus that occurs during spermiogenesis. We have utilized the targeting sequence of KIFC1 to identify interacting proteins in the testis that may be important for this process. We describe here the identification of a testis-specific leucine-rich repeat protein that contains a docking site for PP1 and is localized near the nucleus of developing spermatids.
A leucine-rich repeat protein interacts with the KIFC1 targeting sequence
TLRR is expressed in the testis
In order to detect the TLRR protein in tissue lysates and in sections, an anti-peptide polyclonal antibody was prepared specific for the TLRR protein (see Methods section). The TLRR specific antibody recognizes a 40 kD band only in testis lysate, a size that matches the predicted ORF of the interacting clone (Figure 2B). No protein of this size is detected with the TLRR antibody in the other tissues examined. A 64 kD band is evident in brain but is also recognized by preimmune serum (Figure 2C) and therefore likely represents a nonspecific epitope enriched in this tissue. No signal was visible in epididymal sperm lysate, even at longer exposures, suggesting that TLRR may be discarded during spermatogenesis.
Interaction of TLRR with KIFC1 requires all LRRs
TLRR is specifically associated with the KIFC1 targeting sequence
TLRR is localized to germ cells in the testis
Testis leucine rich repeat, or TLRR, was identified as a protein interacting with the 19 amino acid targeting sequence of the KIFC1 molecular motor in a testis cDNA library. TLRR contains 4 leucine rich repeats (LRRs) in its amino terminus. LRRs are 20–29 residue sequence motifs that are predicted to form a horseshoe shaped structure with internal paired β-sheets and external helices. LRR containing proteins are proposed to function in many different biological processes by providing a versatile structural framework for protein-protein interactions (reviewed in ). The LRR sequences in TLRR most closely match those found in sds22, a regulatory subunit of PP1 in yeast . Indeed, TLRR contains a consensus-binding site for PP1 in its carboxyl terminal domain (Figure 1A). PP1 is a key serine/threonine phosphatase that controls an extremely wide variety of biological processes. In contrast to mammalian kinases which are represented by many genes, the catalytic subunit of PP1 (PP1c) is encoded by just three genes in rodents: PP1α, PP1β/δ and PPγ . The functional diversity of PP1 is achieved by interaction of the catalytic subunit with a variety of regulatory subunits that serve to modulate the activity of this enzyme and target it to the correct intracellular location and/or substrate (reviewed by [13, 16, 17]). TLRR is a good candidate for a testis-specific regulator of PP1 and may participate in regulation of the cellular transformations of spermiogenesis.
Most PP1 isoforms are expressed in a variety of tissues, except for PP1γ2, which is expressed primarily in testis . PP1 isoforms are differentially expressed in male germ cells and mature spermatozoa  and one isoform, PP1γ2, is essential for male fertility [19, 20]. The mammalian homolog of sds22 associates with PP1γ2 in bull spermatozoa where it negatively regulates the activity of this enzyme thereby modulating protein phosphorylation and sperm motility [21, 22]. In contrast to sds22, we cannot detect TLRR in sperm lysate suggesting that TLRR does not play a role in regulating flagellar motility. Besides its presence in the flagella of mature sperm, PP1γ2 is present in differentiating germ cells including secondary spermatocytes, and round and elongating spermatids where it has been suggested to play a role in the morphogenesis of these cells . TLRR is also expressed in these cell types, however, TLRR is localized near the spermatid nucleus and manchette (Figure 5 and 6), whereas PP1γ2 is expressed throughout the cytoplasm .
The manchette is a microtubule based structure that is unique to developing male germ cells. It forms around the nucleus of approximately step 8 spermatids and disappears by step 16. Although it has been studied for many years [23, 24], its precise function and particularly the regulation of its motility along the nucleus are not completely understood. Disruption of the manchette by genetic or chemical means results in distortion of the underlying spermatid nucleus, suggestive of a role for the manchette in nuclear shaping [5, 25]. The manchette has also been proposed to act as a track for the transport of cellular components from the apical to the distal end of the elongating spermatid and as a platform for the localization of signaling molecules [26, 27]. The manchette is present at an optimal temporal and spatial position to provide a site for the assembly of signaling complexes necessary for regulation of the dramatic morphological transformation of the spermatid. Several potential regulatory proteins have been localized to the manchette including RanGTPase [28, 29], a testis specific serine/threonine kinase , and NDP kinase . We present evidence here that a candidate regulatory subunit of PP1 is also localized to this structure.
The work presented here supports the idea that TLRR is a testis specific regulatory subunit of PP1 that might serve to target PP1 and perhaps other regulatory molecules to the nucleus of developing spermatids. TLRR is expressed primarily in the testis where it is localized near the manchette of developing spermatids, perhaps via its association with the microtubule motor KIFC1; both proteins are present at the same time and in a similar pattern on the spermatid nucleus . TLRR is homologous to other PP1 regulatory subunits and contains a binding site for PP1. It will be important to determine whether TLRR physically associates with PP1, whether this association is isoform specific and whether TLRR is able to regulate the activity of this enzyme.
DNA manipulations and Yeast 2-hybrid screen
The KIFC1 bait plasmid was constructed by annealing two complementary oligonucleotides (KIFC1sense and KIFC1antisense) that encode the 19 amino acid targeting sequence followed by ligation into pGBKT7 at the EcoRI and BamHI sites. The sequence of KIFC1sense is GAATTCGGAAAGGCTGCTTCAGGAGCTTCAGGGAGAGCGGCTGCA ATTGCAGGAAGAGCGGACGGATCC and KIFC1antisense is GGATCCGTCCGCTCTT CCTGCAATTGCAGCCGCTCTCCCTGAAGCTCCTGAAGCAGCCTTTCCGAATTC. The sequence of the pKIFC1bait was confirmed by sequencing. The pKIFC1bait plasmid was transformed into yeast strain AH109 and mated to a pretransformed testis cDNA library (Clontech; Palo Alto, CA) in yeast strain Y187. Positively interacting clones were selected for growth on media lacking histidine, adenine, leucine, and tryptophan and containing X-α-Gal. Diploids were restreaked on selective media and the phenotype retested. The interacting prey plasmids were rescued from each clone according to the manufacture's instructions and used to transform competent cells (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA). Plasmid DNA was then isolated using the Wizard Plus SV miniprep kit (Promega; Madison, WI) sequenced by the DNA sequencing facility at ECU and the sequences compared against available databases. The TLRR deletion mutants were constructed by using appropriate primers to amplify the desired fragments by PCR before transfer into pADT7 using the restriction sites EcoRI and BamHI engineered into the PCR primers. TLRRFL (full-length) was amplified with GAATTCGTTCGACTGACGGTGGATTT AATTGCC as the 5' primer and GGATCCCTCCTTTTTCTCAGACAAATTTT CC as the 3' primer. The TLRRA fragment was amplified with the TLRRFL5' primer and GGAATCCCAGA AGCTTTTCGCCTAGAGGGAGCC as the 3' primer. TLRRB was amplified with the TLRRFL3' primer and GAATTCTTTGATCCAAGAACTCTTCGTTCTCTAGCG as the 5' primer. TLRRC was amplified with TLRRFL3' primer and GAATTCTGCAGAAACCTG AGTGTTTTATATTTA as the 5' primer. TLRRD was amplified with the TLRRFL5' primer and GGATCCAGGATTT CCATTTAGATCCATTTTCC as the 3' primer. The TLRR5' deletion mutant was constructed by partial deletion of the IC#2 interacting clone with BglII followed by religation and therefore contains sequences 5' to the ATG of the putative TLRR and extends through amino acid number 166 eliminating the last leucine of the fourth TLRR motif. For characterization of the TLRR antibody, the TLRR ORF was cloned into the bacterial expression vector QE31 in frame with the His6 tag.
β-gal activity assay
β-Galactosidase activity was measured in liquid cultures of yeast using ONPG (O-nitrophenyl B-D-galactopyranoside) as substrate. Cultures of each yeast co-transformant were grown overnight at 30°C in 5 ml of SD selective medium (SD-LEU-TRP, Clontech; Palo Alto, CA), diluted with YPD medium (BD Bioscience; Bedford, MA) and growth continued at 30°C for 3–5 hours with shaking at 230 rpm until the cultures reached OD600 0.5–0.8. 1.5 ml of each culture was transferred to eppendorf tubes, centrifuged, and resuspended in approximately one fifth the original volume with Z buffer (0.06 M Na2HPO4, 0.04 M NaH2PO4, pH 7.0, 0.01 M KCl, 0.001 M MgSO4). Cells were broken by repeated freeze/thaw and the reaction started by addition of 0.7 ml Z buffer with 0.27% β-mercaptoethanol and 160 μl of ONPG (4 mg/ml O-nitrophenyl B-D-galactopyranoside, in Z buffer, Sigma; Atlanta, GA), followed by incubation at 30°C until reactions became yellow, and terminated with 0.4 ml of 1 M Na2CO3. The absorbance of each supernatant at OD420 was determined and the activity calculated according to the following equation: , where T is the incubation time in minutes, V is 0.1 ml × concentration factor, and OD600 is the A600 of 1 ml of culture. The activity of each co-transfectant was assayed in triplicate. The yeast strain AH109 (Clontech; Palo Alto, CA) cotransformed with pGADT7-T and pGBKT7-53 were used as positive control for protein-protein interaction while cells containing pGADT7 and pGBKT7-Lam, expressing proteins that do not interact, were negative controls for these experiments.
A normalized multiple tissue Northern blot (Clontech; Palo Alto, CA) was used to identify TLRR transcripts in different mouse tissues using the TLRRA fragment described above as probe (Figure 3A). Total RNA from various tissues was also isolated using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA), separated, blotted to Nytran (Schleicher and Schull; Keene, NH), and probed with the TLRRA fragment giving identical results (data not shown). The DNA probe was labeled by mixed primer labeling using the High Prime kit from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN) and [α32P]dATP. Blots were hybridized to probe in ExpressHyb solution (Clontech; Palo Alto, CA) or Church and Gilbert solution  overnight at 68°C. After hybridization, blots were washed at high stringency and exposed to X-ray film with a intensifying screens for 1 hour.
Antibody Preparation and Western Blot
The TLRR sequence was scanned for antigenic peptides using the EMBOSS site  and a unique peptide, FSDRNIDSIDDLSLC, was chosen to immunize rabbits (Harlan Bioproducts for Science; Indianapolis, IN). The resultant sera were affinity purified against the corresponding peptide using the Sulfolink kit (Pierce; Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein samples containing equal protein prepared from mouse tissue extracts, or affinity purification fractions, were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) through 10% acrylamide gels or precast 8–16% acrylamide gels (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA), equilibrated in and electrophoretically transferred from the gel matrix to PVDF membrane (BioRad Laboratories; Hercules CA) in Towbin transfer buffer. Proteins were detected on the membrane with affinity purified TLRR antibody. Immune complexes bound to the membrane were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc.; West Grove, PA) diluted 1:40,000 in TTBS (100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween20) and developed with enhanced chemiluminescent reagents as described by the manufacturer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; Piscataway, NJ).
All use of animals was approved and conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching. Mouse testis extract was prepared as previously described . Briefly, decapsulated testes from adult mice were homogenized in buffer (10 mM MES, pH 7.65, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 30% glycerol, 0.1% NP40) containing protease inhibitors (10 μM benzamidine, 0.1 mg/ml leupeptin, 0.1 mg/ml aprotinin, 0.1 mg/ml TAME, 3 μM PMSF) and centrifuged two times, first at 100,000 × g and then 130,000 × g, to remove cellular debris generating a high speed supernatant fraction. Protein concentration in tissue lysates was determined by the Coomassie brilliant blue method (Biorad; Hercules, CA).
An affinity purification column was prepared by attaching the KIFC1 targeting peptide identified previously (GKAASGASGASGRAAAIAGRAD; ) to a methacrylate resin (UNC Microprotein Sequencing and Peptide Synthesis Facility, Department of Microbiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) . The 2 ml column was equilibrated in bead binding buffer (25 mM Potassium Phosphate, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2) supplemented with protease inhibitors. Approximately 20–50 mg testis lysate in 1.0 ml binding buffer was loaded onto the column and incubated, with gentle mixing, overnight at 4°C. The column was then washed with a total of 10–12 ml buffer and the flow through collected until the OD280 had returned to baseline. Bound complexes were eluted from the column in 200 μl fractions first with IgG elution buffer (Pierce; Rockford, IL) followed by IgG elution buffer with 250 mM added NaCl.
Proteins in eluted fraction were precipitated by addition of 1 μl 2% Na Deoxycholate and 5 μl 10% TCA, vortexed for several seconds, and the samples incubated on ice for 30 minutes. Precipitated proteins were pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 10 minutes at room temperature and the supernatant removed. Any residual TCA was then removed from the pellet by incubation with 200 μl acetone, followed by incubation at room temperature for about 10 minutes and centrifugation at 20,000 × g, 10 min at room temperature. The supernatant was removed, the acetone wash repeated and the samples air-dried, resuspended in loading buffer and resolved by PAGE. The presence of the TLRR protein in the column fractions was determined by western blot as described above.
TLRR was detected in tissue sections essentially as previously described . Testes were obtained from sexually mature mice (29–31 g, CD-1; Charles River, Wilmington, MA) and immersion fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) after piercing of the capsule. The organs were then incubated overnight in 0.5 M sucrose in PBS, placed in cryoprotectant, cut into 10 μm sections, transferred to Vectabond coated slides (Vector Laboratories; Burlingame, CA), quickly dipped in -20°C acetone, and allowed to dry. The sections were washed with PBS and treated with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 15 minutes at room temperature. The tissue was blocked in 2% BSA in TBST (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 154 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100) and incubated with TLRR polyclonal antibody diluted 1:50 in TBST (approximately 100 μg/ml).
The TLRR polyclonal antibody was detected with a Texas Red conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:100 dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories; West Grove, PA). DNA was stained with DAPI (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA) incorporated into Vectashield mounting media (Vector Laboratories; Burlingame, CA). In some experiments, the acrosome was stained with FITC conjugated peanut agglutinin (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO) by inclusion in the secondary antibody incubation at a concentration of 20 μg/ml. The intracellular localization of proteins was observed with a Nikon E600 fluorescence microscope fit with appropriate filters and images captured with an Orca II CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ) and analyzed with Metamorph image analysis and acquisition software (Universal Imaging Corporation, Downingtown, PA).
This work was supported in part by NIH GM60628 (AOS) and a grant from the Division of Research and Graduate Studies, East Carolina University. The authors thank Holly Jefferson for technical assistance.
- Clermont Y: Kinetics of spermatogenesis in mammals: seminiferous epithelium cycle and spermatogonial renewal. Physiol Rev. 1972, 52 (1): 198-236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Navolanic PM, Sperry AO: Identification of isoforms of a mitotic motor in mammalian spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod. 2000, 62 (5): 1360-1369. 10.1095/biolreprod62.5.1360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lawrence CJ, Dawe RK, Christie KR, Cleveland DW, Dawson SC, Endow SA, Goldstein LS, Goodson HV, Hirokawa N, Howard J, Malmberg RL, McIntosh JR, Miki H, Mitchison TJ, Okada Y, Reddy AS, Saxton WM, Schliwa M, Scholey JM, Vale RD, Walczak CE, Wordeman L: A standardized kinesin nomenclature. J Cell Biol. 2004, 167 (1): 19-22. 10.1083/jcb.200408113.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang WX, Sperry AO: C-terminal kinesin motor KIFC1 participates in acrosome biogenesis and vesicle transport. Biol Reprod. 2003, 69 (5): 1719-1729. 10.1095/biolreprod.102.014878.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Russell LD, Russell JA, MacGregor GR, Meistrich ML: Linkage of manchette microtubules to the nuclear envelope and observations of the role of the manchette in nuclear shaping during spermiogenesis in rodents. Am J Anat. 1991, 192 (2): 97-120. 10.1002/aja.1001920202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kierszenbaum AL, Tres LL: The acrosome-acroplaxome-manchette complex and the shaping of the spermatid head. Arch Histol Cytol. 2004, 67 (4): 271-284. 10.1679/aohc.67.271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Sperry AO: Comparative analysis of two C-terminal kinesin motor proteins: KIFC1 and KIFC5A. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2004, 58 (4): 213-230. 10.1002/cm.20008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang WX, Jefferson H, Sperry AO: The molecular motor KIFC1 associates with a complex containing nucleoporin NUP62 that is regulated during development and by the small GTPase RAN. Biol Reprod. 2006, 74 (4): 684-690. 10.1095/biolreprod.105.049312.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sperry AO: Molecular Motors: Methods and Protocols. Methods Mol Biol. 2007, Totowa, NJ , Humana Press, 392:Google Scholar
- Kobe B, Kajava AV: The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001, 11 (6): 725-732. 10.1016/S0959-440X(01)00266-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsushima N, Tachi N, Kuroki Y, Enkhbayar P, Osaki M, Kamiya M, Kretsinger RH: Structural analysis of leucine-rich-repeat variants in proteins associated with human diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005, 62 (23): 2771-2791. 10.1007/s00018-005-5187-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohkura H, Yanagida M: S. pombe gene sds22+ essential for a midmitotic transition encodes a leucine-rich repeat protein that positively modulates protein phosphatase-1. Cell. 1991, 64 (1): 149-157. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90216-L.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen PT: Protein phosphatase 1--targeted in many directions. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115 (Pt 2): 241-256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacKelvie SH, Andrews PD, Stark MJ: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene SDS22 encodes a potential regulator of the mitotic function of yeast type 1 protein phosphatase. Mol Cell Biol. 1995, 15 (7): 3777-3785.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sasaki K, Shima H, Kitagawa Y, Irino S, Sugimura T, Nagao M: Identification of members of the protein phosphatase 1 gene family in the rat and enhanced expression of protein phosphatase 1 alpha gene in rat hepatocellular carcinomas. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1990, 81 (12): 1272-1280.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aggen JB, Nairn AC, Chamberlin R: Regulation of protein phosphatase-1. Chem Biol. 2000, 7 (1): R13-23. 10.1016/S1074-5521(00)00069-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ceulemans H, Bollen M: Functional diversity of protein phosphatase-1, a cellular economizer and reset button. Physiol Rev. 2004, 84 (1): 1-39. 10.1152/physrev.00013.2003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takizawa N, Mizuno Y, Ito Y, Kikuchi K: Tissue distribution of isoforms of type-1 protein phosphatase PP1 in mouse tissues and its diabetic alterations. J Biochem. 1994, 116 (2): 411-415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chakrabarti R, Kline D, Lu J, Orth J, Pilder S, Vijayaraghavan S: Analysis of Ppp1cc-null mice suggests a role for PP1gamma2 in sperm morphogenesis. Biol Reprod. 2007, 76 (6): 992-1001. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.058610.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varmuza S, Jurisicova A, Okano K, Hudson J, Boekelheide K, Shipp EB: Spermiogenesis is impaired in mice bearing a targeted mutation in the protein phosphatase 1cgamma gene. Dev Biol. 1999, 205 (1): 98-110. 10.1006/dbio.1998.9100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang Z, Khatra B, Bollen M, Carr DW, Vijayaraghavan S: Sperm PP1gamma2 is regulated by a homologue of the yeast protein phosphatase binding protein sds22. Biol Reprod. 2002, 67 (6): 1936-1942. 10.1095/biolreprod.102.004093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mishra S, Somanath PR, Huang Z, Vijayaraghavan S: Binding and inactivation of the germ cell-specific protein phosphatase PP1gamma2 by sds22 during epididymal sperm maturation. Biol Reprod. 2003, 69 (5): 1572-1579. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.018739.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rattner JB, Brinkley BR: Ultrastructure of mammalian spermiogenesis. 3. The organization and morphogenesis of the manchette during rodent spermiogenesis. J Ultra Res. 1972, 41 (3): 209-218. 10.1016/S0022-5320(72)90065-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wolosewick JJ, Bryan JH: Ultrastructural characterization of the manchette microtubules in the seminiferous epithelium of the mouse. Am J Anat. 1977, 150 (2): 301-331. 10.1002/aja.1001500206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meistrich ML, Trostle-Weige PK, Russell LD: Abnormal manchette development in spermatids of azh/azh mutant mice. Am J Anat. 1990, 188 (1): 74-86. 10.1002/aja.1001880109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kierszenbaum AL: Intramanchette transport (IMT): Managing the making of the spermatid head, centrosome, and tail. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002, 63 (1): 1-4. 10.1002/mrd.10179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tovich PR, Sutovsky P, Oko RJ: Novel aspect of perinuclear theca assembly revealed by immunolocalization of non-nuclear somatic histones during bovine spermiogenesis. Biol Reprod. 2004, 71 (4): 1182-1194. 10.1095/biolreprod.104.030445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kierszenbaum AL, Gil M, Rivkin E, Tres LL: Ran, a GTP-binding protein involved in nucleocytoplasmic transport and microtubule nucleation, relocates from the manchette to the centrosome region during rat spermiogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002, 63 (1): 131-140. 10.1002/mrd.10164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zou Y, Millette CF, Sperry AO: KRP3A and KRP3B: candidate motors in spermatid maturation in the seminiferous epithelium. Biol Reprod. 2002, 66 (3): 843-855. 10.1095/biolreprod66.3.843.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walden PD, Cowan NJ: A novel 205-kilodalton testis-specific serine/threonine protein kinase associated with microtubules of the spermatid manchette. Mol Cell Biol. 1993, 13 (12): 7625-7635.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munier A, Serres C, Kann ML, Boissan M, Lesaffre C, Capeau J, Fouquet JP, Lacombe ML: Nm23/NDP kinases in human male germ cells: role in spermiogenesis and sperm motility?. Exp Cell Res. 2003, 289 (2): 295-306. 10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00268-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Church GM, Gilbert W: Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984, 81 (7): 1991-1995. 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A: EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000, 16 (6): 276-277. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Wang R, Jefferson H, Sperry AO: Identification of motor protein cargo by yeast 2-hybrid and affinity approaches. Methods Mol Biol. 2007, 392: 97-116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Bockler B, Griffiths-Jones S, Hollich V, Lassmann T, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Sonnhammer EL, Bateman A: Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Database issue): D247-51. 10.1093/nar/gkj149.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.