Open Access

Extracellular fluid flow and chloride content modulate H+ transport by osteoclasts

BMC Cell Biology201516:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-015-0066-4

Received: 26 February 2015

Accepted: 28 July 2015

Published: 15 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Bone resorption takes place within the basic multicellular units (BMU), and the surface to be resorbed is isolated from adjacent bone surfaces by a sealing zone between osteoclast membrane and bone matrix, which defines the limits of the resorption lacuna. Considering that the extracellular fluid (ECF) in both BMU and the resorption lacuna can be isolated from its surroundings, I hypothesize that flow and ion composition of the bone ECF in these sites might contribute to the regulation of osteoclast H+ secretion. To investigate this hypothesis, I evaluated the H+ secretion properties of individual osteoclasts and osteoclast-like cells (OCL-cells) and investigated whether changes in flow or chloride content of the extracellular solution modify the H+ secretion properties in vitro.

Results

The results show that 1) osteoclasts are unable to secrete H+ and regulate intracellular pH (pHi) under continuous flow conditions and exhibit progressive intracellular acidification; 2) the cessation of flow coincides with the onset of H+ secretion and subsequent progressive intracellular alkalinization of osteoclasts and OCL-cells; 3) osteoclasts exhibit spontaneous rhythmic oscillations of pHi in non-flowing ECF, 4) pHi oscillations are not abolished by concanamycin, NPPB, or removal of extracellular Na+ or Cl; 5) extracellular Cl removal modifies the pattern of oscillations, by diminishing H+ secretion; 6) pHi oscillations are abolished by continuous flowing of ECF over osteoclasts and OCL-cells.

Conclusions

The data suggest, for the first time, that ECF flow and Cl content have direct effects on osteoclast H+ secretion and could be part of a mechanism determining the onset of osteoclast H+ secretion required for bone resorption.

Keywords

Osteoclast Intracellular pH regulation ClC-7 Proton secretion Bone resorption Bone extracellular fluid Fluorescence microscopy Bis-carboxyethyl-carboxyfluorescein-AM (BCECF-AM)

Background

Bone resorption is important for maintaining mineral homeostasis, adapting to functional loading, and healing damaged and fractured sites. The process of bone consumption is regulated by the number of osteoclasts, and relies heavily on the ability of individual osteoclasts to secrete H+ through the ruffled border, thus lowering the extracellular pH (pHo) at a delimited bone surface.

The first demonstration of an acidic area adjacent to osteoclasts utilized the fluorescent probe acridine orange [1]. Later, it was shown—using pH microelectrodes—that osteoclasts can acidify the contact zone with a culture dish to less than pH 3 within a few minutes [2]. It has been proposed that extracellular acidification is a key step for the dissolution of the apatite-containing mineralized matrix [3, 4] and osteoclast intracellular pH (pHi) regulation [58]; in addition, H+ secretion creates a suitable pH, in the resorption lacuna, for enzymes to degrade the organic matrix [9]. Therefore, bone resorption depends on the expression and activity of H+-secreting proteins at the osteoclast ruffled border.

Several mechanisms have been implicated in contributing to the acidification of the resorption lacuna; such as: H+ secretion through vacuolar H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) [10] and a H+-coupled Cl secretion, by chloride channel 7 (ClC-7) [11]. Furthermore, the Na+/H+ exchanger, NHE-10 isoform [12], and a H+ conductance have been reported to regulate pHi by means of acid secretion [5, 6, 13].

The movement of acid–base equivalents across the plasma membrane is crucial for pHi regulation [14, 15]. At the osteoclast plasma membrane, the base-transporters include NBCn1 (Na+-HCO3 cotransporter) [16], and AE2 (Cl/HCO3 anion exchanger) [12, 17, 18]; and the acid-transporters include V-ATPase, Na+/H+ exchanger and the aforementioned H+ conductance [5, 6, 13]. In addition to its role in osteoclast pH regulation, H+ secretion by the V-ATPase works in parallel with ClC-7 [19], which have been proposed as the key components of cellular machinery for extracellular acidification at the ruffled border (Fig. 1). It should also be noted that pHi regulation is related to the translocation of several ions (as Na+ and Cl) across the plasma membrane by specific proteins.
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of proteins involved in acid and base transfer across the osteoclast plasma membrane. RB = ruffled border; SZ = sealing zone; CA = carbonic anhydrase

Osteoclast activity and function depends on chemical signaling from cellular and paracrine interactions between osteoclasts and osteoblasts, as well as bone marrow and immune cells, and is regulated by several hormones and cytokines [20]. One of the most important signals for induction of osteoclast differentiation and function is the receptor activator of nuclear kappa-B ligand (RANK-L).

Physical stimuli, for instance functional loading and exercise, also play a role in controlling bone formation, resorption and remodeling. Mechanical loading of bone promotes osteocyte responses to fluid shear stress, which results in changes in the osteocyte activity [2124] and indirect inhibition of osteoclast formation and bone resorption [25].

Despite the crucial role of osteoclasts in physiological mineral homeostasis and bone adaptive responses, direct effects of flow and ECF ion composition on osteoclast function are otherwise not known. The primary goal of this work is to investigate the effect of extracellular fluid flow rate (5 mL/min versus 0 mL/min) and Cl content on osteoclast H+ secretion. The results show that both extracellular fluid flow and Cl content modify osteoclast H+ transport.

Results and discussion

H+ secretion after acid load varies among cells in the absence of extracellular solution flow

As previously described by Boron and De Weer [26], applying a solution containing NH4Cl initially causes an increase in pHi. Initially NH3 diffuses across the cell membrane and combines with a H+ inside the cell; NH4 + can also move into the cell through K+ transporters, bringing extra H+, however, this process is slower. The removal of NH4Cl solution causes a decrease in pHi. The intracellular NH3 rushes out the cell, leaving the H+ inside. The cell responds to this fall in pHi by activating acid extruding mechanisms. In a set of experiments, I used bis-carboxyethyl-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF-AM) fluorescence to monitor pHi changes using NH4Cl prepulse technique. Indeed I was able to monitor pHi changes following acid load (Figs. 2 and 3), in both osteoclasts and OCL-cells. A BCECF-loaded osteoclast is shown in (Additional file 1: Figure S1).
Fig. 2

Changes in intracellular pH (pHi) of osteoclasts. The pHi of primary osteoclasts labeled with the pH-sensitive dye BCECF-AM (12 μM) was monitored along time in order to evaluate the H+ secretion under flow and no-flow conditions after the NH4Cl prepulse, which causes an acid load to the cells. Experiments were performed in the absence HCO3 to inhibit base transporters. a. Flowing standard HEPES-buffered solution (5 mL/min) after acid loading is related to a discrete H+ secretion and a small ΔpHi. b. Non-flowing HEPES-buffered solution (0 mL/min) after acid loading is related to a transient H+ secretion and a higher ΔpHi than in flow condition

Fig. 3

Changes in intracellular pH (pHi) of osteoclasts. The pHi of primary osteoclasts labeled with the pH-sensitive dye BCECF-AM (12 μM) was monitored along time in order to evaluate the H+ secretion. a. Primary osteoclast exhibit rhythmic fluctuations in pHi after the NH4Cl prepulse under non-flowing standard HEPES-buffered solution. b. Different patterns of pHi oscillations are observed in the primary osteoclasts under non-flowing standard HEPES-buffered solution, with variations in period and amplitude in cycles of acidification and alkalinization, in the presence or absence of NH4Cl prepulse. Each line represents one osteoclast

It was observed that osteoclasts do not properly regulate pHi after the NH4Cl prepulse in the presence of continuous ECF flow; these cells exhibited a progressive intracellular acidification (n = 6) after discrete recovery from the acid load, which is evidenced by the small ΔpHi (Fig. 2a.) In contrast, when ECF flow was stopped, the osteoclasts secreted H+ at different rates (dpHi/dt) after the acid load (Fig. 2b), resulting in a higher value of ΔpHi in comparison to that obtained under continuous ECF flow. During the first two minutes following the acid load, the dpHi/dt varies from 0.01 to 0.58 pH units/min (n = 27). The values for each osteoclast studied are presented in Additional file 2. The rates of H+ secretion do not appear to be related to cell size; however, there is a positive correlation (r = 0.4522, p = 0.0089, n = 27; one-tailed Pearson) between dpHi/dt and the magnitude of acidification (i.e. the difference between initial pHi and the lowest pHi recorded after NH4Cl solution removal). This correlation was also reported by Ravesloot et al. [6] and may be related to the amount of H+ to be transported after the acid load.

Osteoclasts and OCL-cells exhibit an oscillatory pHi in non-flowing extracellular solution

Under no ECF flow conditions, H+ secretion after the acid load causes intracellular alkalinization to a maximal pHi value. Subsequently, the cells initiate a period of spontaneous cellular acidification to a minimal pHi value; then the alkalization restarts. This oscillatory pattern is repeated in regular periods of spontaneous acidification and alkalinization (Fig. 3a). These rhythmic pHi fluctuations were observed in both osteoclasts and OCL-cells, and were observed in 92 % of experiments performed in the absence of ECF flow. Different patterns of pHi oscillation, with different amplitudes and periods, were also observed (Fig. 3b). In osteoclasts, the period of the oscillations—the time interval between two maximum pHi values—ranged from 12 to 45 min (n = 35), and the amplitude of the pHi oscillations—the difference between the maximum and minimum pHi in each cycle—ranged from 0.12 to 1.43 pH units, the lowest and the highest values recorded, respectively. This huge variation in capability of H+ secretion among osteoclasts could be due to unequally expression of H+-transporting proteins at the plasma membrane, and can be taken as an additional evidence for the osteoclast heterogeneity regarding resorptive machinery already reported by Everts et al. in [27]. Despite the fact that osteoclasts differ from each other in values for period and amplitude of oscillations, one osteoclast analyzed individually exhibits a regular, rhythmic, oscillation, maintaining the range of pHi fluctuation from one cycle to the following and maintaining the period of the oscillations.

The present study is not the first one to report oscillations related to pHi in osteoclasts. In fact, an in situ study using microelectrodes to simultaneously measure H+ currents and pH in the microenvironment beneath adherent osteoclasts, showed that there were pH fluctuations in that compartment [2]. Despite the methodological differences—extracellular versus intracellular measurements—both processes detect pH changes directly related to H+ transported by the osteoclast.

Inhibition of H+-transporting proteins does not abolish the pHi oscillation, but the absence of extracellular Cl modifies its patterns

The inhibition of the Na+/H+ exchanger by applying ECF containing zero sodium (0 Na+) (n = 5), the inhibition of H+-ATPase by concanamycin (n = 3) (Fig. 4a and b) or of H+ channels by Zn2+ (n = 2) did not disrupt or modify the oscillatory pattern of pHi in osteoclasts. Thus, these H+-transporting proteins do not appear to participate in pH regulation by osteoclasts and OCL-cells.
Fig. 4

Effect of inhibitors of H+-secreting proteins in the oscillating intracellular pH (pHi) of primary osteoclasts under non-flowing standard HEPES-buffered solution. a. The pHi oscillations were not abolished by applying a zero Na+ solution (0 Na+), inhibitor of Na+/H+ exchanger. b. The pHi oscillations were not abolished in the presence of concanamycin (Conc.), inhibitor of H+-ATPase. (Nig. = nigericin clamps pHi at 7.0.). c. The pHi oscillations were not abolished in the presence of NPPB, inhibitor of Clˉ channels. d. The pHi oscillations were not abolished by applying a zero Clˉ solution (0 Clˉ), inhibitor of Clˉ transporting proteins; however there is a noticeable and progressive intracellular acidification from one cycle to the next following the removal of extracellular Clˉ (0 Clˉ). e. Parameters applied for the analyses of the oscillating pHi

While this may come as a surprise, this is not the first time such an observation has been reported. Grano et al. [28] demonstrated that in OCL-cells, Na+/H+ exchanger inhibition did not completely eliminate the ability of these cells to regulate pHi. Another study also showed that total replacement of extracellular Na+ had no effect on H+ transport in inside-out vesicles derived from the ruffled border of avian osteoclasts [29]. Furthermore, it has been reported that 40 % of osteoclasts containing at least 10 nuclei facilitate pH recovery from acid load through H+-ATPase, without any participation from the Na+/H+ exchanger [30]. While this latter observation is in contrast to our observed results with concanamycin, our data is in accordance with Nordström et al. [31], which reported that in the absence of HCO3 , pHi regulation by H+-ATPase is negligible in cells under physiological pH.

The removal of extracellular Cl (n = 3) or application of NPPB (n = 3), inhibitor of chloride channels, also did not abolish the pHi oscillations (Fig. 4c and d). However, it should be noted that the removal of extracellular Cl resulted in noticeable difference in the oscillation pattern (n = 3) (Fig. 4d). In control solution, the difference between two maximum values of pHi (pHi max; Fig. 4e) in two consecutive cycles was −0.03 ± 0.004, whilst in the absence of extracellular Clˉ, the difference between two consecutive values of pHi max raised to −0.10 ± 0.007, indicating a compromised ability to secrete H+. The mean time of intracellular acidification (T; Fig. 4e) was ~6 min under control conditions and was increased to ~9 min in the absence of extracellular Clˉ, which may be related to a decreased ability to secrete H+. The mean time of intracellular alkalinization (t; Fig. 4e) was ~15 min under control conditions and was reduced to ~12 min in the absence of extracellular Clˉ, thus shortening the time of H+ secretion by 20 %. In control solution, the difference between two minimum values of pHi (pHi min; Fig. 4e) in two consecutive cycles was −0.01 ± 0.007, whilst in the absence of extracellular Clˉ, the difference between two consecutive values of pHi min raised to −0.12 ± 0.003, indicating further intracellular acidification. Lastly, the mean rate of intracellular alkalinization (dpHi/dt; Fig. 4e) was 0.004 pH units/min under control conditions versus 0.0008 pH unit/min in the absence of extracellular Clˉ, which corresponds to a 5-fold decrease in the H+ secretion rate. Since the experiments were performed in the absence of HCO3 and because the variations in pHi and dpHi/dt are related to H+ transport, the reduced ability to secrete H+ in the absence of extracellular Cl could be due to a impaired exchange of external Cl for internal H+ by a Cl/H+ exchanger.

The importance of Cl transporting proteins (channels) in bone resorption emerged when Blair et al. [29] demonstrated that in avian osteoclasts the H+ secretion through H+-ATPase was dependent on an anion conductance, and non-linearly related to the external concentration of Cl. In fact several Cl-transporting proteins are expressed at the osteoclast ruffled border in different species, including ClC-3, ClC-7, and CLIC5 [3234]. Cl secretion through these proteins would dissipate the transmembrane potential generated by H+-ATPase activity [35].

According to my hypothesis, the absence of extracellular Cl reduces the exchange of Clˉ by intracellular H+, therefore reducing H+ secretion, without any participation of H+-ATPase. This is supported by data demonstrating that the knockdown of ClC-7 expression by interfering RNA reduces the ability of lysosomal acidification in vivo, concluding that ClC-7 is the most important protein for lysosomal acidification [36]. It is also important to consider that bone ECF is not in equilibrium with the bulk extracellular fluid, but instead there is evidence of such a compartimentalization [37]. Higher concentrations of Cl in bone ECF compared to other extracellular compartments in the body can be taken as evidence that an important physiological role for Cl exists in bone.

Taken together, the literature and my results provide evidence supporting the following assertion: ClC-7 may itself secrete H+ through the ruffled border at the bone-osteoclast interface. This new functional role for ClC-7 presented here is in contrast with the function of charge dissipation, in which Cl ions would leave the cell in parallel with protons transported by H+-ATPase [38]. On the other hand, my hypothesis is in accordance with the first documented biophysical properties of chloride-transporting proteins located at the ruffled border, which was shown to be outward rectifying channels [34]. My proposal of a direct role of ClC-7 in secreting H+ at the ruffled border is also in accordance with studies showing that the resorption lacuna of cultured osteoclasts lacking ClC-7 is less acidic [38].

Fluid flow abolishes pHi oscillations and causes intracellular acidification, but the cessation of flow coincides with the onset of the H+ secretion

As previously described in this work, osteoclasts and OCL-cells exhibited spontaneous pHi oscillations in the absence of ECF flow, even in the presence of inhibitors of H+ secreting proteins. However, when the ECF was applied at 5 mL/min—value in accordance to the normal intraosseous blood flow rate range reported by Laroche (2002) [39]—the oscillations of pHi were completely abolished in both osteoclasts and OCL-cells. Furthermore, H+ secretion after the acid load was absent or brief and not sustained, in both osteoclasts and osteoclast-like cells (OCL-cells) (Fig. 2a).

In contrast to the results obtained under no flow conditions, with a flow rate of 5 mL/min the cells exhibited progressive intracellular acidification. However, upon the stoppage of extracellular fluid flow H+ secretion commences, resulting alkalinization in osteoclasts (n = 6) and OCL cells (n = 20) (Fig. 5) and the previously described oscillatory pattern resumes (Fig. 6a). Furthermore, reapplying flow—after a period of pHi oscillation—disrupts the rhythmic fluctuations in pHi displayed by the osteoclasts (n = 4) and OCL-cells (n = 20) observed under no flow conditions (Fig. 6b). Despite the fact that primary osteoclasts and OCL-cells may have differences concerning phenotype, the similar effect of extracellular fluid flow observed in both cells indicate that the mechanisms related to the effect of fluid in H+ secretion properties and pHi regulation are preserved in OCL-cells.
Fig. 5

a. Emitted fluorescence of BCECF-loaded osteoclast-like cells (OCL-cells) individualized in the area defined by the colored circle line by using the MetaFluor 7.1 software (b). pHi of OCL-cells shown in (a). Each line represents one OCL-cell. At the time the flow is stopped (dashed line), pHi become progressively more alkaline, thus indicating H+ secretion since the standard HEPES-buffered solution does not contain HCO3 . c. Transmitted light image of selected osteoclast. d. pHi of the osteoclast shown in c. At the time the flow is stopped (dashed line), pHi become progressively more alkaline, thus indicating H+ secretion since the standard HEPES-buffered solution does not contain HCO3

Fig. 6

Osteoclast intracellular pH (pHi). a. The transition from a period of continuous flow (5 mL/min) to a period of non-flowing (0 mL/min) standard HEPES-buffered solution causes pHi oscillation. b. Inversely, the transition from a period of non-flowing (0 mL/min) standard HEPES-buffered solution to a period of continuous flow (5 mL/min) abolishes pHi oscillation

This regulation of H+ transport by fluid dynamics of ECF may be relevant during BMU assembly, whereby the canopy over the site to be resorbed isolates local conditions from that in the bulk ECF. In addition, it provides new evidence for a role to intraosseous circulation in regulating the events occuring in the BMU, as highlighted by Parfitt (2000) [40]. The modulation of osteoclast H+ secretion by the fluid dynamics here described, along with the regulation of osteoclast function by hypoxia described by Arnett et al. (2003) [41], may also serve as regulatory mechanisms for bone resorption in situations where there is stasis or a disruption of the blood supply, such as that occuring in bone fractures or in compression sites during orthodontic treatments.

Conclusions

In summary, I observed that in the presence of ECF flow, osteoclasts and OCL-cells appear to be unable to secrete H+ and the pHi continuously falls. In contrast, when extracellular fluid flow is stopped the cells begin to secrete H+ and pHi increases as extracellular pH reduces. The oscillations in osteoclast pHi could be due to the reversion of ion fluxes (i.e. H+ and Cl) across the osteoclast plasma membrane. Therefore, it is hypothesized that extracellular Cl alters the rate of H+ secretion by the exchange of Cl and H+ mediated by ClC-7 at the ruffled border. This provides novel evidence for the participation of ClC-7 in osteoclast H+ secretion and bone resorption.

My data highlight, for the first time, that flow and Cl content of the ECF both modulate H+ secretion by the osteoclast, independently of H+-ATPase, and suggest different and potentially more important roles for ClC-7 in bone resorption than previously recognized. Further studies must be performed in order to better understand these aspects of osteoclast biology.

Methods

Isolation of osteoclasts from long bones

Mature osteoclasts were collected under aseptic conditions from the long bones of newborn Wistar rats. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Standing Committee on Animal Research of the University of São Paulo (Protocol No. 090-35/02). The removed bones were washed with cold α-MEM (Gibco, Grand Island, NE), minced, and cells were detached by repeated pipetting. The debris was allowed to sediment for 30 s, and then the cell suspension was collected. Cells were placed on plastic coverslips at a density of 5 × 106 cells/mL in 300 mOsm/L α-MEM containing 20 IU/L penicillin G, 20 μg/L streptomycin and 0.05 μg/L amphotericin B, 10 % of fetal calf serum and 20 mM N-2- hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES). Cells were kept in a CO2 incubator (Lab-Line Instruments, Melrose Park, IL) at 5 % CO2, pH 7.4 at 37 °C, for at least two hours before experiments. Mature osteoclasts collected from long bones were selected based on their morphology, using phase contrast microscopy (Olympus IX70, Tokyo, Japan). After selected experiments, further confirmation of the cell phenotype was performed using tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or by immunocytochemistry using an antibody against the calcitonin receptor (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), a specific marker for osteoclasts (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7

Mature primary osteoclasts were selected based on their morphology, using phase contrast optic system (Olympus IX70; 200 X) (a). In some experiments, it was performed further confirmation of the cell phenotype by immunofluorescence using antibody against calcitonin receptor (CTR) (confocal microscope Zeis LSM510; 200 X), a specific marker of osteoclasts (b), or by cytochemistry for tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) (TRAP kit, Sigma, USA; 200 X) (c)

Generation of OCL-cells in vitro

For differentiation of precursor cells in OCL-cells, marrow cells were collected from long bones of 6 to 8 weeks-old Wistar rats. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Standing Committee on Animal Research of the University of São Paulo (Protocol No. 090-35/02). Osteoclast-like cells were generated as described by Arnett et al. [41] with modifications; briefly, by using 50 ng/mL of recombinant mouse macrophage colony stimulating factor (rmM-CSF) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and 10 ng/mL of recombinant mouse receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (rmRANK-L) (R&D Systems). Cells were maintained in 300 mOsm/L α-MEM containing 20 IU/L penicillin G, 20 μg/L streptomycin and 0.05 μg/L of amphotericin B, 10 % of fetal calf serum and 20 mM HEPES on plastic coverslips, in a CO2 incubator (Lab-Line Instruments, India) at 5 % CO2, pH 7.4 at 37 °C, for up to 7 days. The culture medium was changed every 3 or 4 days.

Experimental solutions and chemicals

All pHi experiments were performed in the absence of NaHCO3, in order to avoid activity of proteins involved in base transport (i.e. Na+-HCO3 cotransporters). The composition of experimental solutions is shown as additional data. The experimental solutions were maintained at 37 °C regardless of flow conditions.

Concanamycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), the H+-ATPase inhibitor, was used at a final concentration of 100 mM [5]. NPPB [5-Nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino) benzoic acid] (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK), the chloride channel inhibitor, was used at a final concentration of 100 μM [42]. ZnCl2 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), the proton channel inhibitor, was used at a final concentration of 100 μM [5].

pHi records

The changes in cellular pHi were monitored by measuring the change in 12 μM BCECF-AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) fluorescence on an Olympus IX70 microscope. The emitted fluorescence after excitation at 490 nm (EF 490 nm) is related to pHi, and that emitted after excitation at 440 nm is insensitive to pHi, but indicates dye concentration and dye loss by photobleaching during fluorescence records. The pHi was analyzed in the presence or absence of inhibitors of H+ ATPase, proton channels and ClC-7; in the presence or absence of extracellular Na+ or Cl, in order to inhibit Na+ and Cl-dependent mechanisms, respectively; and in the presence (5 mL/min) or absence (0 mL/min) of extracellular fluid flow. The flow and/or exchange of the ECF were controlled using syringe pump (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT).

I also investigated the effect of acid loading the osteoclasts by exposing the cells to a solution of 20 mM NH4Cl for 1–2 min [26]. The entry of NH3 into the cell causes a transient alkalinization of pHi due to the reaction of NH3 with intracellular H+ forming the ion NH4 +; subsequently, the entry of NH4 leads to intracellular acidification. The replacement of NH4Cl solution for a standard HEPES-buffered solution (pH 7.4, at 37 °C) causes the pHi to fall abruptly. The osteoclasts ability to secrete H+ after the acid load was investigated over time in the presence or absence of ECF flow. The rates of H+ secretion were calculated as the linear regression—dpHi/dt—for the two first minutes after the lowest pHi value induced by the NH4Cl prepulse was obtained, or for the entire period in the analysis of pHi oscillations.

Data analyzes

The ratiometric approach was used to generate a parameter related to pH rather than dye concentration [14]. Briefly, the emitted light (above 510 nm) after excitation at 490 nm (EF490) and 440 nm (EF440) was recorded using the MetaFluor 7.1 software. The emitted fluorescence after excitation at 490 nm is sensitive to both dye concentration and pHi, and the emitted fluorescence after excitation at 440 nm (isosbestic wavelength) is not sensitive to changes in pHi. The fluorescence ratio values (R = EF490/EFI440) were converted to pHi using a calibration technique involving the use of high-[K+]/nigericin (10 μM) Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) as previously described [6]. Detailed calibration was performed on a set of cells and a single-point calibration was routinely performed at the end of all the pHi records. Representative pHi values of individual osteoclasts and OCL during the course of the experiments were plotted versus time.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

At the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, I would like to thank Drs. Gerhard Malnic, Margarida de Mello Aires and Raif Musa Aziz for thoughtful discussions and for making their laboratory available for experiments. At University College of London, I would like to thank to Dr. Timothy Arnett for helpful advice on osteoclast research protocols.

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brasil. PM was recipient of fellowship from CNPq (Process N. 142097/2006-3).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo
(2)
Department of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo - Unifesp

References

  1. Baron R, Neff L, Louvard D, Courtoy PJ. Cell-mediated extracellular acidification and bone resorption: evidence for a low pH in resorbing lacuna and localization of a 100-kD lysosomal membrane protein at the osteoclast ruffled border. J Cell Biol. 1985;101(6):2210–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Silver IA, Murrills RJ, Etherington DJ. Microelectrode studies on the acid microenvironment beneath adherent macrophages and osteoclasts. Exp Cell Res. 1988;175(2):266–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kwon K, Wang E, Chung A, Chang N, Lee S. Effect of salinity on hidroxyapatite dissolution studied by atomic force microscopy. J Phys Chem. 2009;113(9):3369–72.Google Scholar
  4. Bruzzaniti A, Baron R. Molecular regulation of osteoclast activity. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006;7(1–2):123–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nordström T, Rotstein OD, Romanek R, Asotra S, Heersche JNM, Manolson MF, et al. Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in osteoclasts. Contribution of proton pumps and a proton-selective conductance. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(5):2203–12.Google Scholar
  6. Ravesloot JH, Eisen T, Baron R, Boron WF. Role of Na+/H+ exchangers and vacuolar H + −pumps in intracellular pH regulation in neonatal rat osteoclasts. J Gen Physiol. 1995;105(2):177–208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Morethson P, Mello-Aires M. Acid extrusion and intracellular pH regulation in primary osteoclasts cultured on glass. Calc Tissue Int. 2008;82:S131–2.Google Scholar
  8. Morethson P. Osteoclast proton transport modulation by fluid flow. Bone. 2011;48:S135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Garnero P, Borel O, Byrjalsen I, Ferreras M, Drake‖ FH, McQueney MS, Foged NT, Delmas PD, Delaissé JM. The collagenolytic activity of cathepsin K is unique among mammalian proteinases. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:32347–52.Google Scholar
  10. Vaananen HK, Karhukorpi EK, Sundquist K, Wallmark B, Roininen I, Hentunen T, et al. Evidence for the presence of a proton pump of the vacuolar H+-ATPase type in the ruffled borders of osteoclasts. J Cell Biol. 1990;111(3):1305–11.Google Scholar
  11. Kelly ME, Dixon SJ, Sims SM. Outwardly rectifying chloride current in rabbit osteoclasts is actived by hyposmotic stimulation. J Physiol. 1994;475:377–89.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee SH, Kim T, Park ES, Yang S, Jeong D, Choi Y, et al. NHE10, an osteoclast-specific member of the Na+/H+ exchanger family, regulates osteoclast differentiation and survival [corrected]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;369(2):320–6.Google Scholar
  13. Bouyer P, Sakai H, Itokawa T, Kawano T, Fulton CM, Boron WF, et al. Colony-stimulating factor-1 increases osteoclast intracellular pH and promotes survival via the electroneutral Na+/HCO3- cotransporter NBCn1. Endocrinology. 2007;148(2):831–40.Google Scholar
  14. Bevensee MO, Boron WF. Control of Intracellular pH. In: Alpern RJ, Caplan M, Moe OW, editors. Seldin and Giebisch’s The Kidney: Physiology & Pathophysiology. Fifth Edition. New York: Elsevier Inc; 2013.Google Scholar
  15. Parker MD, Boron WF. The Divergence, Actions, Roles, and Relatives of Sodium-Coupled Bicarbonate Transporters. Physiol Rev. 2013;93:803–959.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Riihonen R, Nielsen S, Vaananen HK, Laitala-Leinonen T, Kwon TH. Degradation of hydroxyapatite in vivo and in vitro requires osteoclastic sodium-bicarbonate cotransporter NBCn1. Matrix Biol. 2010;29:287–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Teti A, Blair HC, Teitelbaum SL, Kahn AJ, Koziol C, Konsek J, et al. Cytoplasmic pH regulation and chloride/bicarbonate exchange in avian osteoclasts. J Clin Invest. 1989;83(1):227–33.Google Scholar
  18. Wu J, Glimcher LH, Aliprantis AO. HCO3 /Cl anion exchanger SLC4A2 is required for proper osteoclast differentiation and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:16934–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Supanchart C, Kornak U. Ion channels and transporters in osteoclasts. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;473(2):161–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sims NA, Martin TJ. Coupling the activities of bone formation and resorption: a multitude of signals within the basic multicellular unit. BoneKEy Reports. 2014;3:481.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cowin SC, Moss-Salentijn L, Moss ML. Candidates for the mechanosensory system in bone. J Biomech Enginering. 1991;113(2):191–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Salter DM, Robb JE, Wright MO. Electrophysiological responses of human bone cells to mechanical stimulation: evidence for specific integrin function in mechanotransduction. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(7):1133–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Noble BS, Peet N, Stevens HY, Brabbs A, Mosley JR, Reilly GC, et al. Mechanical loading: biphasic osteocyte survival and targeting of osteoclasts for bone destruction in rat cortical bone. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003;284(4):C934–43.Google Scholar
  24. Aguirre JI, Plotkin LI, Stewart SA, Weinstein RS, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC, et al. Osteocyte apoptosis is induced by weightlessness in mice and precedes osteoclast recruitment and bone loss. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(4):605–15.Google Scholar
  25. Tan SD, de Vries TJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Semeins CM, Everts V, Klein-Nulend J. Osteocytes subjected to fluid flow inhibit osteoclast formation and bone resorption. Bone. 2007;41(5):745–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Boron WF, De Weer P. Intracellular pH transients in squid giant axons caused by CO2, NH3, and metabolic inhibitors. J Gen Physiol. 1976;67(1):91–112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Everts V, de Vries TJ, Helfrich MH. Osteoclast heterogeneity: lessons from osteopetrosis and inflammatory conditions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792(8):757–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Grano M, Faccio R, Colucci S, Paniccia R, Baldini N, Zallone AZ, et al. Extracellular Ca2+ sensing is modulated by pH in human osteoclast-like cells in vitro. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:C961–8.Google Scholar
  29. Blair HC, Teitelbaum SL, Tan HL, Koziol CM, Schlesinger PH. Passive chloride permeability charge coupled to H(+)-ATPase of avian osteoclast ruffled membrane. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:C1315–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lees RL, Heersche JN. Differences in regulation of pH(i) in large (>/=10 nuclei) and small (</=5 nuclei) osteoclasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000;279(3):C751–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nordström T, Shrode LD, Rotstein OD, Romanek R, Goto T, Heersche JN, et al. Chronic extracellular acidosis induces plasmalemmal vacuolar type H+ ATPase activity in osteoclasts. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(10):6354–60.Google Scholar
  32. Schlesinger PH, Blair HC, Teitelbaum SL, Edwards JC. Characterization of the osteoclast ruffled border chloride channel and its role in bone resorption. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:18636–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao H, Ross FP. Mechanisms of osteoclastic secretion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1116:238–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Okamoto F, Kajiya H, Toh K, Uchida S, Yoshikawa M, Sasaki S, et al. Intracellular ClC-3 chloride channels promote bone resorption in vitro through organelle acidification in mouse osteoclasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;294(3):C693–701.Google Scholar
  35. Carraro-Lacroix LR, Lessa LM, Fernandez R, Malnic G. Physiological implications of the regulation of vacuolar H+-ATPase by chloride ions. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2009;42(2):155–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Graves AR, Curran PK, Smith CL, Mindell JA. The Cl/H+ antiporter ClC-7 is the primary chloride permeation pathway in lysosomes. Nature. 2008;453(7196):788–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Green J, Kleeman CR. Role of bone in regulation of systemic acid–base balance. Editorial Review. Kidney Int. 1991;39:9–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kornak U, Kasper D, Bösl MR, Kaiser E, Schweizer M, Schulz A, et al. Loss of the ClC-7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man. Cell. 2001;104(2):205–15.Google Scholar
  39. Laroche M. Intraosseous circulation from physiology to disease. Joint Bone Spine. 2002;69(3):262–9. Review.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Parfitt AM. The mechanism of coupling: a role for the vasculature. Bone. 2000;26(4):319–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Arnett TR, Gibbons DC, Utting JC, Orriss IR, Hoebertz A, Rosendaal M, et al. Hypoxia is a major stimulator of osteoclast formation and bone resorption. J Cell Physiol. 2003;196(1):2–8.Google Scholar
  42. Okamoto F, Kajiya H, Fukushima H, Jimi E, Okabe K. Prostaglandin E2 activates outwardly rectifying Cl() channels via a cAMP-dependent pathway and reduces cell motility in rat osteoclasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287(1):C114–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Morethson. 2015