Biochemical, electron microscopic and immunohistological observations of cationic detergent-extracted cells: detection and improved preservation of microextensions and ultramicroextensions
© Nakamura; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001
Received: 24 April 2001
Accepted: 13 June 2001
Published: 13 June 2001
Filopodia, retraction fibers and microvilli, are fragile microextensions of the plasma membrane that are easily damaged by mechanical force during specimen preparation for microscopy. To preserve these structures for electron microscopy glutaraldehyde is generally used, but it often causes antigen masking. By contrast, formaldehyde is generally used for immunofluorescence light microscopy, but few studies have been concerned with the loss of microextensions.
We demonstrate in biochemical experiments that cultured cells needed to be kept in 4% formaldehyde for at least 60 min at room temperature or for 20 min at 37°C to irreversibly crosslink most of the polypeptides. Also, fragmentation of fragile microextensions was observed after Triton X-100 extraction depending on concentration and extent of crosslinking. We also report on a novel fixation procedure that includes the cationic detergent dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DOTMAC). Treatment of NIH3T3 cells with DOTMAC resulted in complete removal of membrane lipids and in good preservation of the cytoskeleton in microextensions as well as preservation of ultramicroextensions of <0.05μm in diameter that have not been observed previously unless glutaraldehyde was used. Stress fibers and microextensions of DOTMAC-extracted cells were readily stained with anti-β-actin antibodies, and antibodies to vinculin and moesin stained focal contacts and microextensions, respectively.
Some microextensions were fragmented by the standard Triton X-100 permeabilization method. By contrast, DOTMAC completely extracted membrane lipids while maintaining the cytoskeleton of microextensions. Thus, DOTMAC treatment may provide a valuable new tool for the reliable visualization of previously undetectable or poorly detectable antigens while preserving the actin cytoskeleton of microextensions.
Cellular events are based on specific inter- and intra-molecular interactions of many molecules. To experimentally dissect such interactions, it is important to maintain as closely as possible the cytosolic environment of the living cell. Detergents are frequently employed to disrupt cells for the demonstration and isolation of functionally relevant protein complexes and/or to selectively extract certain proteins. For example, the non-ionic detergents Triton X-100, Tween 20 or Brij, have been widely used for histochemical purposes or in biochemical experiments to separate detergent-soluble from a detergent-resistant residue [1,2,3]. The latter is commonly referred to as the "cytoskeleton" or "membrane skeleton" . During cell activation discrete signaling molecules are known to associate with or to disassociate from the plasma membrane and both, the cytoskeleton and membrane skeleton undergoes significant changes as well [4,5,6,7]. For cytochemical purposes, however, detergents cannot be used before cells have been fixed, as non-ionic detergent treatment causes removal of the cells from their supporting surface (e.g. cover glass). The choice of fixative for a particular cytochemical study is often a difficult task owing to the limited available information about the effects of fixatives on cultured cells.
Considering their effect on proteins, fixatives in general can be divided into two types: "coagulant" or "non-coagulant". Both groups of fixatives have advantages and disadvantages. The coagulant fixatives, including methanol [8, 9], ethanol , acetone , and trichloroacetic acid [10, 12], denature and precipitate proteins. These fixatives stop biological reactions instantaneously and presumably leave proteins in their original locations. Due to extraction of membrane structures by such fixatives it is not necessary to add detergents during staining with membrane impermeable probes such as antibodies. However, the denaturation of proteins seen with these fixatives has disadvantages for some probes [8, 12] and for visualizing intact cell surfaces. Moreover, it is not known if and to what extent proteins are lost during specimen preparation for microscopic observation (e.g. during incubation or washing procedures). The non-coagulant fixatives are mainly chemical crosslinkers that include glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, acrolein, and dithiobis (succinimidylpropionate). They are used to preserve surface morphology of cells and to immobilize cellular components before extraction with detergents [8, 13, 14]. However, excess crosslinking frequently masks binding domains for probes while inadequate fixation may not preserve structures to leave them susceptible to mechanical forces during specimen processing. The latter is quite critical especially to preserve fine and fragile cellular microextensions such as filopodia or retraction fibers [15, 16].
We have been interested in the formation and function of microextensions because of their dynamic and universal nature, and since moesin, an actin-binding protein is enriched in these structures [17, 18]. The F-actin-binding activity of moesin is regulated by both phosphorylation and polyphosphoinositides (PIPs)1. Interestingly, PIPs could be substituted for by a cationic detergent, dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DOTMAC) in vitro . This result was consistent with biochemical extraction studies, since phosphorylated moesin specifically co-sedimented with DOTMAC-, but not Triton X-100-resistant components, most likely because Triton X-100 interfered with the interaction between moesin and PIPs . This result also suggested that Triton X-100 extraction of cells may not preserve moesin-actin filament complexes.
As expected, we show here that some of microextensions were fragmented by the standard Triton X-100 permeabilization method. By contrast, DOTMAC completely extracted membrane lipids while maintaining the cytoskeleton of microextensions.
We also observed microextensions having a considerably smaller diameter from those commonly seen (<0.05 μm vs. 0. 2 μm). Referred to here as ultramicroextensions, these extended from cell bodies and grew out from the tips of other microextensions. DOTMAC treatment exposed and stabilized their cytoskeleton as well.
Examination of microextensions of NIH3T3 fibroblast by scanning electron microscopy
Exposure of cytoskeleton in microextensions and ultramicroextensions by DOTMAC extraction
We have performed ultrastructural analysis by SEM of cells fixed and/or extracted by the methods listed in Table 1. When the cells were treated with coagulant fixatives, the cytoskeleton was apparently exposed, but the three dimensional structures at the edge of the cells were not preserved as well as those prepared by the DOTMAC/PFA method (data not shown). When the cells were extracted with Triton X-100, NP-40 or saponin after relatively weak fixation with formaldehyde, the cytoskeleton apparently was lost, fragmented, or scraped off depending on the concentration of detergents and the period of incubation (Table 2). Too high a concentration of glutaraldehyde or incubation for extended period of time in formaldehyde, on the other hand, did not allow to expose the cytoskeleton (data not shown).
Comparison of different fixation/extraction methods for preservation and fluorescence labeling of microextensions
We also compared the different fixation and extraction procedures listed in Table 1 with respect to fluorescence intensity and labeling of actin stress fibers and microtubules, and with respect to morphological preservation of cells and microextensions (Table 2). The latter was also assessed from SEM micrographs before and after preparation for fluorescence microscopy and these results are summarized in Table 2 as well.
Staining of actin and tubulin filaments differed depending on the probe and on the fixative. Among the coagulant fixatives, acetone produced the best results with respect to preservation of microextensions, staining of actin with either phalloidin or with monoclonal β-actin antibodies, and staining of microtubules with a monoclonal anti-β-tubulin reagent. After methanol or ethanol fixation, some cells were partially detached and changed their shape, but this did not occur with other coagulant fixatives. Acetone also provided good preservation of microextensions even after preparing the cells for immunolabeling, whereas some of the microextensions were lost, when cells were fixed with other coagulant fixatives (Table 2).
Evaluation of crosslinked polypeptides after fixation and extraction
Crosslinking of polypeptides was also evaluated after treatment with several other fixatives that preserved microextensions well and that were found to be useful previously for moesin staining (Figure 6B). Only a small amount of polypeptides was extracted when cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde or DSP-Tsb (Figure 6B, lane 2, 3 and 6) and the cells were morphologically well preserved by these fixatives as observed by SEM, indicating that most proteins were irreversibly crosslinked. On the other hand, when cells were fixed with PLP or LP and treated with 1% saponin in 3% BSA for permeabilization, most of the polypeptides were either not crosslinked by these relatively mild fixatives or crosslinks were reversed by the addition of SDS sample buffer (Figure 6B, lanes 4 and 5). Similar results were obtained when cells were fixed with 3.7% formalin or 4% PFA, followed by permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100. Threonine558-phosphomoesin was not dephosphorylated in these fixatives, as determined by western blotting with specific phosphomoesin antibodies (Figure 6B). We examined the effect of incubation time and temperature during fixation with 4% PFA in PBS(+), since conditions for irreversible crosslinking of polypeptides in cultured cells with formaldehyde are unknown. As shown in Figure 6C, fixation under the widely used conditions at room temperature (25°C) for 20 min, is not sufficient to irreversibly crosslink actin, moesin and many other polypeptides. At 37°C, the required time for incubation can be shortened, but most of the actin molecules were not irreversibly crosslinked even after 30 min. Incubation with sodium borohydride after fixation in PFA had no effect either (data not shown) suggesting that reversible bridges may have formed that could not be reduced.
Biochemical analysis of DOTMAC-insoluble materials of NIH3T3 cells
We also analysed for tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in the insoluble fraction of cells treated with pervanadate (PV), a potent inhibitor of tyrosine phosphatases, extracted with 0.5% detergent. A larger fraction of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were recovered in the DOTMAC-insoluble pellet (unpublished observation)
DOTMAC induces bundling of actin filaments and microtubules
Detection and definition of micropodia and ultramicroextensions
Extensions of the cell surface were first described as fibrous projections of tissue culture cells by electron microscopy in 1945 . Since then, the terminology has varied in the literature and extensions have been designated as pseudopodia , microextensions , retraction fibers , microspikes , filopodia [24, 27, 28], often without a clear definition of these terms. Microvilli are light microscopically distinct from filopodia and retraction fibers . Filopodia or microspikes extend actively from the cell surface, whereas retraction fibers are extensions that have been left behind by a retracting lamellipodium or that are derived from an attached filopodium. We use the term "micropodia" here for morphologically describing filopodia, microspikes, and retraction fibers, and to differentiate these structures from lamellipodia. While the transiently occurring filopodia and retraction fibers can largely be distinguished only by time-lapse video microscopy , both, micropodia and lamellipodia, are functionally related to movement of cells. Micropodia were reported to have diameters of about 0.2 μm  or 0.08∼ 0.16 μm  and lengths ranging from 5 to 30 μm . On the other hand, microvilli are more permanent discrete cylindrical projections about 0.1 μm in diameter and up to 2 μm in length  that may serve different purposes, such as in brushborder membranes of the intestinal epithelium or in lymphocytes. Numerous slender extensions running in parallel were observed previously, when rat epithelial (parenchymal) cells adhere to each other . Similar structures also occur in primary keratinocytes mediating intercellular adhesion . However, these extensions appeared to be thicker (estimated as 0.1μm in diameter, although their apparent diameter depended on conditions of coating with metals).
Our experiments were focused on the analysis of microextensions and their cytoskeletal core by SEM and confocal laser scanning microscopy by searching for a new fixation protocol. Here, we clearly show that NIH3T3 cells not only extend microextensions of 0.1∼ 0.2 μm in diameter and of up to ∼ 40 μm in length, but also slender structures of less than 0.05 μm diameter. The latter were previously described in the tumor cell lines K-A31 (Balb/3T3 clone A31 transformed by murine sarcoma virus, ), and in A875, a malignant human lung melanoma line . In K-A31 cells, membranous strands with diameters of less than 0.1 μm extended away from and between cells over distances of 10-15 μm. In A875 cells, "filopodia" had diameters of 0.05 μm or less and were often branched. However, details of these structures were not given and not further discussed. In the literature, terms such as slender filopodia [34, 35], or slender microvilli [36, 37] have been used. All filopodia and microvilli are morphologically slender and these descriptive terms in general have not been used to refer to microextensions having a particular dimension. In order to distinguish them from others and to avoid confusion, we propose the term ultramicroextensions for discrete cellular extensions that are less than 0.05 μm in diameter. Ultramicroextensions extend like micropodia from the cell surface, from the tips of micropodia, from microvilli, or they branch out from micropodia or other ultramicroextensions. We strongly believe that these are unique structures and not artificially created by our sample preparation technique. First, unless cells contacted each other, they were rarely seen even after incubation for prolonged periods, suggesting that they are not simply created by the collapse of parts of the cell. Secondly, their shape is rather similar to the generally larger microspikes or microvilli. Future work might show that they can be detected by differential interference-contrast microscopy and electronic image processing or other techniques, which would greatly facilitate functional studies. Ultramicroextensions may be difficult to distinguish by immunofluorescence microscopy from micropodia that also appear as small fluorescent dots on the cell body, or they may remain undetected due to low fluorescence signal owing to their small size. The filopodia of spreading 3T3 cells were extensively studied by Albrecht-Buehler et al [21, 27, 29], but ultramicroextensions were not described presumably because these studies were carried out during early spreading of 3T3 cells. Cells that do not touch other cells rarely display ultramicroextensions even after long periods of incubation. Ultramicroextensions were quite frequent between cells and on the surface of cells grown at confluency. This suggests that their formation is triggered by contact with other cells and that they are not primarily related to cell movement.
Preservation and exposure of cytoskeleton in microextensions and ultramicroextensions
We have successfully exposed the cytoskeleton of microextensions and ultramicroextensions using a newly developed fixative that contains DOTMAC. In order to study the structure of the cytoskeletal network it is necessary to extract cells with a detergent to expose cytoskeletal filaments for electron microscopic imaging. Several detergents were tested for their effects on cytoskeletal structures by Schliwa et al. , but the cationic detergent DOTMAC was not included. In addition, past studies on the cytoskeleton of detergent-extracted cells have mainly focused on the cell body and subcortex [3, 8], but not on microextensions. Although extraction can be done before, during, or after fixation, we used simultaneous extraction and fixation, because (i) cytoskeletal molecules may be rearranged or altered during fixation, as irreversible crosslinking of polypeptides is not complete even after 15 min incubation with 4% PFA at 37°C; (ii) although actin was more difficult to extract, moesin and other polypeptides were removed already with 0.5% DOTMAC in the absence of PFA. Addition of 1% PFA was a necessary compromise to visualize the cytoskeleton and its associated molecules no matter which detergent was being used.
Although DOTMAC induced bundling of actin filaments and microtubules, which could have affected ultrastructural features of the cytoskeleton, microextensions of DOTMAC/PFA-extracted cells did not differ from those of non-treated cells. On the contrary, bundling of actin filaments by DOTMAC may have stabilized these actin-containing structures. In SEM, micropodia, ultramicroextensions and microvilli were well preserved, but their lipid membranes apparently were lost. This made it possible to trace the origin of micropodia and ultramicroextensions. While the cytoskeleton of micropodia appeared to connect to the cytoskeleton located at the edge of the cells, by contrast, filaments of ultramicroextensions seemed to extend from or connect to cytoplasmic, rather than subcortical structures.
Triton X-100 is the most widely used detergent to expose the cytoskeleton for biochemical and immunohistological studies, but without prefixation it caused a marked loss of cytoskeletal material [38, 39]. This method also has been criticized for loss of the microtrabecular lattice [3, 40]. This loss is sometimes advantageous to expose certain types of filaments , but this was not relevant to our study. Triton X-100 is not useful and even inappropriate for exposing and maintaining the cytoskeleton of microextensions. The fragmentation of microextensions and the amount of material lost with this detergent were time, temperature and concentration dependent. The cytoskeleton tended to be unmasked at low temperatures and at low concentrations of Triton X-100, and the loss of material occurred especially in lamellipodia . These earlier data are consistent with our results concerning lamellipodia, but other microextensions were ignored. Previous authors preferred to use 1% Triton X-100, a relatively high concentration of detergent, because it is critical for rapid solubilization of the cell membrane and cessation of cell activity. However, 1% Triton X-100 destroyed microextensions even in PEM buffer. Another problems with Triton X-100 is that most of the cells detached from the substrate and the remaining cells are usually quite distorted in shape . We have seen similar shape changes with Triton X-100-extracted cells after relatively short prefixation with formaldehyde (Table 2).
The composition of the extraction buffer is an important factor . Although MTSB, which is essentially similar to PHEM, PEM, or MTPB, was shown to give the best preservation of the cytoskeleton, no morphological differences were seen between these buffers and PBS(+), when the cells were extracted with DOTMAC (data not shown). Addition of phalloidin, taxol, or PEG did not make a difference either (data not shown). In our experience, the divalent cations in PBS(+) prevented the cellular retraction seen within a few minutes with PBS and are necessary to maintain interactions between DOTMAC-resistant components and the substrate (data not shown). DOTMAC, on the other hand, caused rapid cessation of all cell activity.
The type of fixative is another important determinant for the analysis of cell shape and structural integrity of the cytoskeleton. Glutaraldehyde is considered the best fixative to preserve these structures, but there are associated disadvantages. Prefixation and postfixation with glutaraldehyde precludes exposure of the cytoskeleton and, also quite frequently, the binding of antibody probes. On the other hand, formaldehyde is a rather weak crosslinker. A crosslink formed by formaldehyde between two functional groups is theoretically and experimentally a non-reducible methylene bridge. Such bridges are readily hydrolysed during washing. The only irreversible reaction would be one that takes place slowly with the aromatic hydrogen . Our studies provide first systematic data that cells should be kept in 4% PFA for at least 60 min at room temperature or for 20 min at 37°C to irreversibly crosslink most of the polypeptides (Figure 6). Thus, enzymatic reactions or rearrangement of components in the cytosol could occur for some time during fixation. In fact, dephosphorylation of moesin occurred in mouse epithelial MTD-1 cells during fixation in 1% or 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 min . As shown here, however, moesin apparently was not dephosphorylated in PFA-based fixatives in NIH3T3 cells. These conflicting results could be due to differences of cell type and/or antibody reactivity. We have prepared the formaldehyde solution by dissolving PFA in water, because it was pointed out that methanol included in commercial formaldehyde as a preservative, is enough to cause retraction of ruffles and lamellipodia . However, no morphological difference between PFA and formaldehyde was apparent when cells were extracted with DOTMAC (data not shown).
Evaluation of DOTMAC/PFA method by fluorescent microscopy
Amieva et al.  pointed out that some microextensions may be lost during fixation and washing steps, and Nobes and Hall  added glutaraldehyde to the fixative in order to stain these delicate structures with phalloidin, but glutaraldehyde had to be omitted for immunostaining. Because the procedure developed here resulted in a comparable preservation of microextensions, we systematically analysed these structures with various probes by immunofluorescence microscopy. The DOTMAC/PFA method provided excellent morphological preservation of actin stress fibers and microextensions and high intensity immunolabeling of actin, while phalloidin staining was poor probably owing to partial denaturation of actin filaments. The DOTMAC/PFA method thus should be considered the method of choice for the preservation and immunostaining of microextensions or when cells fixed by other methods cannot be stained with certain antisera.
Functional significance of fractionation of polypeptides into DOTMAC-resistant components in NIH3T3 cells
We have previously shown that purified threonine558-phosphomoesin selectively co-sedimented with actin filaments in the presence of DOTMAC or PIPs, but excess Triton X-100 disrupted the interaction of moesin with PIPs . Furthermore, the cytoskeletal association of threonine558-phosphomoesin was maintained when platelets were extracted with DOTMAC, but not with Triton X-100. These results were consistent with a model of an allosteric change induced by PIPs (or DOTMAC) that exposed and maintained a cytoskeleton-binding site of moesin. In NIH3T3 cells, however, unlike in platelets, most of threonine558-phosphomoesin was retained in the Triton X-100-insoluble, but only ∼ 20% in the DOTMAC-insoluble fraction. How can this difference be reconciled? One possibility is that moesin in NIH3T3 cells is modified differently. For example, moesin is tyrosine phosphorylated in v-src-transfected MDCK cells . A second possibility is that threonine558-phosphomoesin interacts with non-extractable membrane constituents besides actin filaments in cells other than platelets. For example, the N-terminal domain of moesin lacking the C-terminal F-actin binding domain remained strongly associated with the NP-40-insoluble material of NIH3T3 cells . While this issue needs further work, it is clear that detergent extraction alone cannot be used as the sole criterion for cytoskeletal association of proteins such as moesin as stated frequently in the recent literature.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and antibodies
DME medium was obtained from Nissui (Tokyo, Japan) or Sigma (St. Louis, MO). FCS was purchased from GIBCO BRL Life Technologies (Paisley, Scotland) or Sigma. Other tissue culture reagents were purchased from GIBCO. All lipids were from Sigma. Glutaraldehyde (70% stock in water, EM grade), paraformaldehyde (PFA), and organic solvents were purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). Anti-β-actin mouse mAb (A5441), anti-β-tubulin mouse mAb (T4026), anti-vinculin mouse mAb (V9131), anti-mouse IgG FITC conjugate (F2012), anti-rabbit IgG FITC conjugate (F1262), anti-rabbit IgG TRITC conjugate (T5268), and TRITC labeled phalloidin were purchased from Sigma. Anti-mouse IgG rhodamine conjugate (AP124R) was obtained from Chemicon International (Temecula, CA). Affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies (95/1) were used for the identification of moesin by immunoblotting and for immunofluorescence. The affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies against threonine558-phospho-moesin were prepared as described previously . Actin was prepared as described previously . Tubulin was purchased from Cytoskeleton (Denver, CO).
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were grown in DME medium containing 1000 mg/liter glucose, supplemented with 10% FCS, 4 mM L-glutamine, penicillin (100 IU/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml), at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Cells were washed with PBS containing 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 (PBS(+)), detached by treating with 0.05% trypsin in PBS or 0.02% EDTA in PBS. The suspended cells were washed with PBS, resuspended in growth medium, and plated on FCS-coated glass coverslips for microscopy, or onto 35-mm or 100-mm Falcon plastic culture dishes (Beckton Dickinson, Lincoln, NJ) or FCS-coated glass culture dishes for biochemical experiments. In some cases, detached cells were resuspended in growth medium without washing.
Scanning electron microscopy
For the observation of cellular surface, cells were rinsed with PBS(+) and fixed with PBS(+) containing 2% glutaraldehyde (dilute 70% glutaraldehyde just before use) at 4°C for 1 hour. In most references, cells were rinsed with PBS (although PBS, in some references, means PBS that contains CaCl2 and MgCl2), but we preferred PBS(+) because retraction of cells were observed in a few minutes when the cells were exposed to PBS even briefly. Samples were then washed with distilled water, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, transferred into t-butylalchohol, and dried in Freeze Dryer ES-2030 (Hitachi, Japan). Dried samples were coated with Pt-Pd in Ion Sputter E-1030 (Hitachi, Japan) for 120 seconds, and were examined under an S-4200 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan) at 15 kV. Micrographs were taken at 0° or 60° tilt.
Fixation and extraction for microscopy
Cells on glass coverslips were rinsed with PBS(+), fixed and/or extracted by one of the procedures listed in Table 1. Methanol-free formaldehyde solution can be obtained from commercial sources, but it has to be used within a week and is more expensive than PFA powder . Although formaldehyde and PFA were used in papers as listed in Table 1 and formaldehyde solutions may have been obtained from commercial sources, for our study a formaldehyde aqueous stock solution was prepared by dissolving 20 g of PFA powder in 90 ml of double distilled water. The mixture was heated to 60-65°C and the pH was adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH. The solution was diluted with water to 100 ml (final concentration 20%) and stored at 4°C for not more than one week. In earlier work, formaldehyde solutions may have been prepared from formalin that contains 37% formaldehyde and 8∼ 15% methanol. Unless noted as formalin, formaldehyde solutions were solely prepared here as described above. Therefore, formaldehyde and PFA are essentially indistinguishable. Buffers were prepared as 2× or 5× stock solutions. Magnesium-and calcium-free PBS was used unless noted otherwise in the references. When detailed descriptions were lacking, specimens were treated as listed in Table 1.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Blocking of nonspecific binding sites and incubation with antibodies basically followed procedures detailed in references, but cells were stained as follows when descriptions were lacking. After the cells were soaked in 1% BSA/PBS for 30 min, they were treated with the primary antibodies in 1% BSA/PBS for 1 h. The cells were then washed with PBS three times, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies in 1% BSA/PBS for 1 h. For the detection of actin filaments, 100 ng/ml TRITC-phalloidin was mixed with the second antibody solution. For double staining, secondary antibodies that did not cross-react with each other were chosen. Cells were washed three times in PBS for 5 min and rinsed with water at room temperature, mounted in PermaFluor (Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA) and observed under a laser scanning confocal microscope (MRC-1024, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). Confocal sections were taken with an iris aperture of 2.0. Images were processed using Adobe Photoshop software.
Evaluation of crosslinking by polypeptide analysis after fixation and extraction
Subconfluent cultures of NIH3T3 cells on 3.5 cm plastic culture dishes, were rinsed with PBS(+), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS(+) at room temperature or 37°C, or fixed and/or extracted by one of the procedures listed in Table 1. For some experiments, cells after fixation were treated twice with 0.5 mg/ml NaBH4 in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. After rinsing with PBS, the any material remaining on the dish was extracted with 200 μl of 1× SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, pH 6.8) at room temperature for 30 min in preparation for SDS-PAGE. The dissolved material was recovered and heated at 95°C for 10 min and resolved by SDS-PAGE on a 9% polyacrylamide gel. Polypeptides were stained with Coomassie Brilliant blue or immunologically stained with antibodies after transfer to nitrocellulose or polyvinylidenedifluoride membranes.
Extraction for western blotting
NIH 3T3 cells were detached from the dishes in the presence of 1 μM calyculin A, but not staurosporine and pervanadate. In order to exclude the effect of attachment on the extractability of proteins, suspended cells were used as a control sample. The cells were cultured on 10 cm plastic culture dishes as described above. The subconfluent cells were washed three times with PBS(+), once with PBS, detached by treating with 0.02% EDTA in PBS. The suspended cells were collected, centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min, and resuspended with PBS. The suspensions were divided and incubated with or without 1 μM calyculin A, 1 μM staurosporine, or 100 μM pervanadate in 200 μl of PBS(+) for 10 min at 37°C. The cells were extracted for 5 min on ice with 200 μl of 2× detergent extraction buffer (2% of Triton X-100 or DOTMAC, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EGTA, 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, protease inhibitor cocktail [20 μg/ml aprotinin, 20 μM E-64, 200 μM leupeptin, 200 μM p-amidinophenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride], 2 μM calyculin A, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 2 μM staurosporine, 20 μM phalloidin, and 20 μg/ml taxol). The lysates were centrifuged at 15,800 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The resulting pellets were solubilized in 150 μl of 1× SDS sample buffer. Total lysate was prepared by adding 150 μl of 1× SDS sample buffer to the pelleted cells after drug treatment described above. All samples were heated at 95°C, sonicated and resolved by SDS-PAGE on a 9% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresed under reducing conditions as described . β-Actin, moesin, and phosphorylated moesin were detected by immunoblotting and the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system.
Lipid analysis of detergent-resistant components
When NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were treated with Triton X-100 lysis buffer, most of the cells detached from the culture dish. This made it impossible to quantitatively analyze lipids in the detergent-insoluble fraction of attached growing cells. Therefore, the cells were suspended using EDTA before lipid analysis and extracted with detergent extraction buffer as described above. The lysates were centrifuged at 15,800 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed with PBS. The lipids were extracted with 0.5 ml of chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min at 37°C from the pellet. After centrifugation at 15,800 × g for 5 min, the supernatant was concentrated under nitrogen and spotted on a 10 × 10 cm Silica gel thin layer glass plate (LHP-K, Whatman). Phospholipids were separated by chromatography in 100:75:7:4 of chloroform:methanol:acetic acid:water. Plates were stained with 40% sulfuric acid in water. L-α-phosphatidylethanolamine, L-α-phosphatidylcholine, L-α-phosphatidyl-L-serine, L-α-phosphatidylinositol, L-α-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate, sphingomyelin were identified by using a standard solution.
When the cells were treated with DOTMAC lysis buffer, they did not detach and, therefore, lipids could be extracted directly from the cells on glass culture dishes with 1 ml of chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) after treatment with the detergent extraction buffer. The solvents and residues were collected in a tube and sonicated in an ultrasonic bath as described above. After centrifugation at 15,800 × g for 5 min, lipids were analysed from the supernatant as described above.
Transmission electron microscopy
The phalloidin-stabilized α-actin filaments (1 μM) were incubated in buffer F (5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM Na2ATP, 2 mM MgCl2, 140 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM DTT, 0.2 mM CaCl2, 0.005% sodium azide) with or without 0.1 % DOTMAC for 10 min at 25°C. The taxol-stabilized β-tubulin (1 μM) was also incubated in PEM buffer (100 mM PIPES, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, pH6.8) containing 1 mM GTP with or without 0.1 % DOTMAC for 10 min at 25°C. 10 μl of samples were adsorbed for 60 s to carbon-coated 400 mesh/inch copper grids that were rendered hydrophilic by glow discharge for 15 s in air at low pressure. The grids were washed with 100 mM KCl and stained for 60 s on six drops of 1% uranyl acetate. Microscopy was performed on a HITACHI H-8100 electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.
List of abbreviations
transmission EM. Other abbreviations are indicated in Table 1.
I am grateful to Dr. Heinz Furthmayr (Stanford University) and Dr. Monika Pilichowska (New England Medical Center) for critically reading the manuscript and for valuable suggestions. I also thank Tsuruji Sato (Tohoku University) for excellent technical help on electron microscopy.
- Osborn M, Webster RE, Weber K: Individual microtubules viewed by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy in the same PtK2 cell. J. Cell Biol. 1978, 77: R27-34. 10.1083/jcb.77.3.R27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Rollins TE, Smith WL: Subcellular localization of prostaglandin-forming cyclooxygenase in Swiss mouse 3T3 fibroblasts by electron microscopic immunocytochemistry. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255: 4872-4875.PubMed
- Schliwa M, van Blerkom J, Porter KR: Stabilization and the cytoplasmic ground substance in detergent-opened cells and a structural and biochemical analysis of its composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1981, 78: 4329-4333.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Fox JE: The platelet cytoskeleton. Thromb. Haemost. 1993, 70: 884-893.PubMed
- Meyer zu Heringdorf D, Liedel K, Kaldenberg-Stasch S, Michel MC, Jakobs KH, Wieland T: Translocation of microfilament-associated inhibitory guanine-nucleotide-binding proteins to the plasma membrane in myeloid differentiated human leukemia (HL-60) cells. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996, 235: 670-676.View ArticlePubMed
- Liu M, Qin Y, Liu J, Tanswell AK, Post M: Mechanical strain induces pp60src activation and translocation to cytoskeleton in fetal rat lung cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271: 7066-7071. 10.1074/jbc.271.12.7066.View ArticlePubMed
- Foster LJ, Yaworsky K, Trimble WS, Klip A: SNAP23 promotes insulin-dependent glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes: possible interaction with cytoskeleton. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276: C1108-1114.PubMed
- Bell PBJ, Safiejko-Mroczka B: Improved methods for preserving macromolecular structures and visualizing them by fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Microsc. 1995, 9: 843-857.PubMed
- Wagner MC, Barylko B, Albanesi JP: Tissue distribution and subcellular localization of mammalian myosin I. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 119: 163-170. 10.1083/jcb.119.1.163.View ArticlePubMed
- Leong SP, Cooperband SR, Deckers PJ, Sutherland CM, Cesare JF, Krementz ET: Effect of different fixatives on the localization of human melanoma antigens by immunofluorescence. Oncology. 1979, 36: 202-207.View ArticlePubMed
- Stendahl OI, Hartwig JH, Brotschi EA, Stossel TP: Distribution of actin-binding protein and myosin in macrophages during spreading and phagocytosis. J. Cell Biol. 1980, 84: 215-224. 10.1083/jcb.84.2.215.View ArticlePubMed
- Hayashi K, Yonemura S, Matsui T, Tsukita S: Immunofluorescence detection of ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins with their carboxyl-terminal threonine phosphorylated in cultured cells and tissues. J Cell Sci. 1999, 112: 1149-1158.PubMed
- Lamberts R, Goldsmith PC: Fixation, fine structure, and immunostaining for neuropeptides: perfusion versus immersion of the neuroendocrine hypothalamus. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1986, 34: 389-398.View ArticlePubMed
- King JC, Lechan RM, Kugel G, Anthony EL: Acrolein: a fixative for immunocytochemical localization of peptides in the central nervous system. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1983, 31: 62-68.View ArticlePubMed
- Bell PB: The application of scanning electron microscopy to the study of the cytoskeleton of cells in culture. Scanning Electron Microsc. 1981, 2: 139-157.
- Nobes CD, Hall A: Rho GTPases control polarity, protrusion, and adhesion during cell movement. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 144: 1235-1244. 10.1083/jcb.144.6.1235.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Amieva MR, Furthmayr H: Subcellular localization of moesin in dynamic filopodia, retraction fibers, and other structures involved in substrate exploration, attachment, and cell-cell contacts. Exp. Cell Res. 1995, 219: 180-196. 10.1006/excr.1995.1218.View ArticlePubMed
- Nakamura F, Amieva MR, Furthmayr H: Phosphorylation of threonine 558 in the carboxyl-terminal actin-binding domain of moesin by thrombin activation of human platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270: 31377-31385. 10.1074/jbc.270.20.12319.View ArticlePubMed
- Nakamura F, Huang L, Pestonjamasp K, Luna EJ, Furthmayr H: Regulation of F-Actin Binding to Platelet Moesin In Vitro by Both Phosphorylation of Threonine 558 and Polyphosphatidylinositides. Mol Biol Cell. 1999, 10: 2669-2685.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Rajaraman R, Rounds DE, Yen SP, Rembaum A: A scanning electron microscope study of cell adhesion and spreading in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 1974, 88: 327-339.View ArticlePubMed
- Albrecht-Buehler G, Goldman RD: Microspike-mediated particle transport towards the cell body during early spreading of 3T3 cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1976, 97: 329-339.View ArticlePubMed
- Amieva MR, Litman P, Huang LQ, Ichimaru E, Furthmayr H: Disruption of dynamic cell surface architecture of NIH3T3 fibroblasts by the N-terminal domains of moesin and ezrin: in vivo imaging with GFP fusion proteins. J. Cell Sci. 1999, 112: 111-125.PubMed
- Porter KR, Claude A, Fullam EF: A study of tissue culture cells by electron microscopy. J. Exp. Med. 1945, 8: 233-246. 10.1084/jem.81.3.233.View Article
- Kinnander H, Gustafson T: Further studies on the cullular basis of gastrulation in the sea urchin larva. Exp. Cell Res. 1960, 19: 278-290.View ArticlePubMed
- Taylor AC, Robbins E: Observations on microextensions from the surface of isolated vertebrate cells. Dev. Biol. 1963, 7: 660-673.View Article
- Weiss P: From cell to molecules. In: The molecular control of cellular activity Edited by Allen J. pp. 1-72. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company;. 1961, 1-72.
- Albrecht-Buehler G: Filopodia of spreading 3T3 cells. Do they have a substrate-exploring function?. J. Cell Biol. 1976, 69: 275-286. 10.1083/jcb.69.2.275.View ArticlePubMed
- Furthmayr H, Lankes W, Amieva M: Moesin, a new cytoskeletal protein and constituent of filopodia: its role in cellular functions. Kidney Int. 1992, 41: 665-670.View ArticlePubMed
- Albrecht-Buehler G, Lancaster RM: A quantitative description of the extension and retraction of surface protrusions in spreading 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 1976, 71: 370-382. 10.1083/jcb.71.2.370.View ArticlePubMed
- Fazekas I, Bacsy E, Rappay G: Surface topography of cultured anterior pituitary cells of the rat. Acta Anat. 1982, 114: 88-96.View ArticlePubMed
- Vasioukhin V, Bauer C, Yin M, Fuchs E: Directed actin polymerization is the driving force for epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Cell. 2000, 100: 209-219. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81559-7.View ArticlePubMed
- Porter KR, Todaro GJ, Fonte V: A scanning electron microscope study of surface features of viral and spontaneous transformants of mouse Balb-3T3 cells. J. Cell Biol. 1973, 59: 633-642. 10.1083/jcb.59.3.633.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Gonda MA, Aaronson SA, Ellmore N, Zeve VH, Nagashima K: Ultrastructural studies of surface features of human normal and tumor cells in tissue culture by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. J Natl. Cancer Inst. 1976, 56: 245-263.PubMed
- Paavola LG, Boyd CO: Surface morphology of macrophages in the regressing corpus luteum, as revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Anat. Rec. 1979, 195: 659-681.View ArticlePubMed
- Isenberg WM, Bainton DF, Newman PJ: Monoclonal antibodies bound to subunits of the integrin GPIIb-IIIa are internalized and interfere with filopodia formation and platelet aggregation. Blood. 1990, 76: 1564-1571.PubMed
- Speilberg L, Evensen O, Nafstad P: Liver of juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.: a light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study, with special reference to the sinusoid. Anat. Rec. 1994, 240: 291-307.View ArticlePubMed
- Quaroni A, Tian JQ, Goke M, Podolsky DK: Glucocorticoids have pleiotropic effects on small intestinal crypt cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 277: G1027-1040.PubMed
- Bell PB, Miller MM, Carraway KL, Revel JP: SEM-revealed changes in the distribution of the triton-insoluble cytoskeleton of Chinese hamster ovary cells induces by dibutyryl cyclic AMP. pp. 899-906. In: Becker RP, Johari O, ed. Scanning electron microscopy. 1978
- Knull HR: Extraction of glycolytic enzymes: myo-inositol as a marker of membrane porosity. J. Neurochem. 1985, 45: 1433-1440.View ArticlePubMed
- Svitkina TM, Borisy GG: Correlative light and electron microscopy of the cytoskeleton of cultured cells. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 298: 570-592. 10.1016/S0076-6879(98)98045-4.View ArticlePubMed
- Pearse AGE: The chemistry of fixation, 3rd edn. London: Churchill;. 1968
- Takeda H, Nagafuchi A, Yonemura S, Tsukita S, Behrens J, Birchmeier W, Tsukita S: V-src kinase shifts the cadherin-based cell adhesion from the strong to the weak state and beta catenin is not required for the shift. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 131: 1839-1847. 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1839.View ArticlePubMed
- Nakamura F, Amieva MR, Hirota C, Mizuno Y, Furthmayr H: Phosphorylation of 558T of moesin detected by site-specific antibodies in RAW264.7 macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 226: 650-656. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1410.View ArticlePubMed
- Aarts LH, Schrama LH, Hage WJ, Bos JL, Gispen WH, Schotman P: B-50/GAP-43-induced formation of filopodia depends on Rho-GTPase. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1998, 9: 1279-1292.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Azuma T, Witke W, Stossel TP, Hartwig JH, Kwiatkowski DJ: Gelsolin is a downstream effector of rac for fibroblast motility. EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J. 1998, 17: 1362-1370. 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1362.View Article
- Bloom L, Ingham KC, Hynes RO: Fibronectin regulates assembly of actin filaments and focal contacts in cultured cells via the heparin-binding site in repeat III13. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1999, 10: 1521-1536.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Friedman MJ, Krstulovic AM, Colin H, Guiochon G, Pajer K: Serum indole-3-acetic acid in control subjects and newly abstinent alcoholics after an oral loading with L-tryptophan: a preliminary study using liquid chromatography with amperometric detection. Anal. Biochem. 1984, 142: 480-486.View ArticlePubMed
- Gauthier-Rouviere C, Vignal E, Meriane M, Roux P, Montcourier P, Fort P: RhoG GTPase controls a pathway that independently activates Rac1 and Cdc42Hs. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1998, 9: 1379-1394.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Hesketh JE, Ciesielski-Treska J, Aunis D: A phase-contrast and immunofluorescence study of adrenal medullary chromaffin cells in culture: neurite formation, actin and chromaffin granule distribution. Cell Tissue Res. 1981, 218: 331-343.View ArticlePubMed
- Kalman D, Gomperts SN, Hardy S, Kitamura M, Bishop JM: Ras family GTPases control growth of astrocyte processes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1999, 10: 1665-1683.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Laterra J, Silbert JE, Culp LA: Cell surface heparan sulfate mediates some adhesive responses to glycosaminoglycan-binding matrices, including fibronectin. J. Cell Biol. 1983, 96: 112-123. 10.1083/jcb.96.1.112.View ArticlePubMed
- Lazarides E, Weber K: Actin antibody: the specific visualization of actin filaments in non-muscle cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1974, 71: 2268-2272.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- McLean IW, Nakane PK: Periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde fixative. A new fixation for immunoelectron microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1974, 22: 1077-1083.View ArticlePubMed
- Muller RT, Honnert U, Reinhard J, Bahler M: The rat myosin myr 5 is a GTPase-activating protein for Rho in vivo: essential role of arginine 1695. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1997, 8: 2039-2053.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Mullink H, Walboomers JM, Tadema TM, Jansen DJ, Meijer CJ: Combined immuno- and non-radioactive hybridocytochemistry on cells and tissue sections: influence of fixation, enzyme pre-treatment, and choice of chromogen on detection of antigen and DNA sequences. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1989, 37: 603-609.View ArticlePubMed
- Nobes CD, Hall A: Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell. 1995, 81: 53-62.View ArticlePubMed
- Peranen J, Auvinen P, Virta H, Wepf R, Simons K: Rab8 promotes polarized membrane transport through reorganization of actin and microtubules in fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 135: 153-167. 10.1083/jcb.135.1.153.View ArticlePubMed
- Suetsugu S, Miki H, Takenawa T: The essential role of profilin in the assembly of actin for microspike formation. EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J. 1998, 17: 6516-6526. 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6516.View Article
- Vielkind U, Swierenga SH: A simple fixation procedure for immunofluorescent detection of different cytoskeletal components within the same cell. Histochemistry. 1989, 91: 81-88.View ArticlePubMed
- Yamashiro-Matsumura S, Matsumura F: Intracellular localization of the 55-kD actin-bundling protein in cultured cells: spatial relationships with actin, alpha-actinin, tropomyosin, and fimbrin. J. Cell Biol. 1986, 103: 631-640. 10.1083/jcb.103.2.631.View ArticlePubMed
- Wheatley SP, Wang YL: Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy in cultured cells. Methods Cell Biol. 1998, 57: 313-332.View ArticlePubMed
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.